<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for on productions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onproductions.com.au/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onproductions.com.au</link>
	<description>film and video production</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 17:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ElectionWIRE by What others have said&#8230; &#124; Vibewire</title>
		<link>http://onproductions.com.au/2010/07/23/electionwire/comment-page-1/#comment-287</link>
		<dc:creator>What others have said&#8230; &#124; Vibewire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 17:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onproductions.com.au/?p=734#comment-287</guid>
		<description>[...] On Productions. July2010.  Blog  -  electionWIRE [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] On Productions. July2010.  Blog  -  electionWIRE [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lynx Angel Ambush by re turn on</title>
		<link>http://onproductions.com.au/2011/06/02/lynx-angel-ambush/comment-page-1/#comment-269</link>
		<dc:creator>re turn on</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onproductions.com.au/?p=1025#comment-269</guid>
		<description>Thanks Dom! It was a blast to work on too, dropping angels on folk kind of makes you feel like God!

Completely forgot to give props to agency awesomo &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.frankpr.com.au/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Frank PR&lt;/a&gt;, with whom we collaborated</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Dom! It was a blast to work on too, dropping angels on folk kind of makes you feel like God!</p>
<p>Completely forgot to give props to agency awesomo <a href="http://www.frankpr.com.au/" rel="nofollow">Frank PR</a>, with whom we collaborated</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lynx Angel Ambush by Dom</title>
		<link>http://onproductions.com.au/2011/06/02/lynx-angel-ambush/comment-page-1/#comment-265</link>
		<dc:creator>Dom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 12:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onproductions.com.au/?p=1025#comment-265</guid>
		<description>very cool!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very cool!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Shoot Yourself by re turn on</title>
		<link>http://onproductions.com.au/2011/02/22/shoot-yourself/comment-page-1/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>re turn on</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 21:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onproductions.com.au/?p=973#comment-233</guid>
		<description>World of Eos was very successful from what I&#039;ve heard. I haven&#039;t seen any other brands doing UGC campaigns either, though there are all sorts of creative opportunities to do so. They should incorporate video too, as the video capabilities on many of these cameras is a strong selling point.

Panasonic have also targeted aspiring creatives with their ads for Lumix, which pokes fun at the art-snob stereotype in the way it &quot;Leads by Example&quot;
&lt;object width=&quot;560&quot; height=&quot;349&quot;&gt;&lt;param name=&quot;movie&quot; value=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/d-hxBkca5l4?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name=&quot;allowFullScreen&quot; value=&quot;true&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name=&quot;allowscriptaccess&quot; value=&quot;always&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;embed src=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/d-hxBkca5l4?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&quot; type=&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash&quot; allowscriptaccess=&quot;always&quot; allowfullscreen=&quot;true&quot; width=&quot;560&quot; height=&quot;349&quot;&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>World of Eos was very successful from what I&#8217;ve heard. I haven&#8217;t seen any other brands doing UGC campaigns either, though there are all sorts of creative opportunities to do so. They should incorporate video too, as the video capabilities on many of these cameras is a strong selling point.</p>
<p>Panasonic have also targeted aspiring creatives with their ads for Lumix, which pokes fun at the art-snob stereotype in the way it &#8220;Leads by Example&#8221;<br />
<object width="560" height="349"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/d-hxBkca5l4?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/d-hxBkca5l4?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="349"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Shoot Yourself by James</title>
		<link>http://onproductions.com.au/2011/02/22/shoot-yourself/comment-page-1/#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 01:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onproductions.com.au/?p=973#comment-231</guid>
		<description>World of Eos took it a step further with the Photochain, encouraging shutterbugs to submit a photo based off a subject from the prior photo. I don&#039;t know whether any other camera brands did a UGC campaign, certainly not as well</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>World of Eos took it a step further with the Photochain, encouraging shutterbugs to submit a photo based off a subject from the prior photo. I don&#8217;t know whether any other camera brands did a UGC campaign, certainly not as well</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Shoot Yourself by Tweets that mention on productions » Blog Archive » Shoot Yourself -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://onproductions.com.au/2011/02/22/shoot-yourself/comment-page-1/#comment-229</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention on productions » Blog Archive » Shoot Yourself -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 04:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onproductions.com.au/?p=973#comment-229</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jye Smith and Oscar Nicholson, Phoebe Netto. Phoebe Netto said: RT @returnon: Just blogged: Camera commercials lead by example, appealing to the aspiring creative in all of us http://bit.ly/ei2VcV [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jye Smith and Oscar Nicholson, Phoebe Netto. Phoebe Netto said: RT @returnon: Just blogged: Camera commercials lead by example, appealing to the aspiring creative in all of us <a href="http://bit.ly/ei2VcV" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/ei2VcV</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on vulnerABILITY by re turn on</title>
		<link>http://onproductions.com.au/2011/02/03/vulnerability/comment-page-1/#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>re turn on</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 23:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onproductions.com.au/?p=963#comment-213</guid>
		<description>This is a recent local example of brands embracing a candid messaging strategy, in politics no less (hat tip to &lt;a href=&quot;http://mumbrella.com.au/should-you-ever-say-sorry-in-an-ad-39196&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Mumbrella&lt;/a&gt;).
&lt;object width=&quot;480&quot; height=&quot;385&quot;&gt;&lt;param name=&quot;movie&quot; value=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/EXUy9qr9nXs?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name=&quot;allowFullScreen&quot; value=&quot;true&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name=&quot;allowscriptaccess&quot; value=&quot;always&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;embed src=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/EXUy9qr9nXs?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&quot; type=&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash&quot; allowscriptaccess=&quot;always&quot; allowfullscreen=&quot;true&quot; width=&quot;480&quot; height=&quot;385&quot;&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Of course, this being politics, the opposition couldn&#039;t help taking a dig.
&lt;object width=&quot;560&quot; height=&quot;340&quot;&gt;&lt;param name=&quot;movie&quot; value=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/WvR4hFa3JDI?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name=&quot;allowFullScreen&quot; value=&quot;true&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name=&quot;allowscriptaccess&quot; value=&quot;always&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;embed src=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/WvR4hFa3JDI?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&quot; type=&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash&quot; allowscriptaccess=&quot;always&quot; allowfullscreen=&quot;true&quot; width=&quot;560&quot; height=&quot;340&quot;&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
So in a market where brands (political brands in this instance) freely take potshots at one another, who do you think delivers the more effective message? The one being candid about their flaws without hiding behind a bullet-proof vest of irony? The goof throwing eggs at the self-serious?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a recent local example of brands embracing a candid messaging strategy, in politics no less (hat tip to <a href="http://mumbrella.com.au/should-you-ever-say-sorry-in-an-ad-39196" rel="nofollow">Mumbrella</a>).<br />
<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/EXUy9qr9nXs?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/EXUy9qr9nXs?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object><br />
<br />
Of course, this being politics, the opposition couldn&#8217;t help taking a dig.<br />
<object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/WvR4hFa3JDI?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/WvR4hFa3JDI?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object><br />
<br />
So in a market where brands (political brands in this instance) freely take potshots at one another, who do you think delivers the more effective message? The one being candid about their flaws without hiding behind a bullet-proof vest of irony? The goof throwing eggs at the self-serious?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Flood of Emotions by Live-out Nanny</title>
		<link>http://onproductions.com.au/2011/01/14/flood/comment-page-1/#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>Live-out Nanny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 10:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onproductions.com.au/?p=872#comment-207</guid>
		<description>The Queensland floods have had one good outcome; damage to the sugarcane crops means there&#039;ll be less sugar in the world this year! Sugar bad!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Queensland floods have had one good outcome; damage to the sugarcane crops means there&#8217;ll be less sugar in the world this year! Sugar bad!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on vulnerABILITY by re turn on</title>
		<link>http://onproductions.com.au/2011/02/03/vulnerability/comment-page-1/#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>re turn on</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 06:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onproductions.com.au/?p=963#comment-202</guid>
		<description>True, people will never regard brands in the same way as actual people in the social media space, but they are beginning to expect the same behavior of brands as they are of people.

There is a great moment in the great documentary &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0379225/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Corporation&lt;/a&gt;, where a forensic psychologist is asked to define a corporation as if it were a person. Its concluded that a corporation would be a sociopath, because they lack empathy and pursue their own ends without consideration for other people. Companies have never been subject to significant public opinion before social media&#039;s prevalence, only to shareholder, investor or customer opinion. That is their only impetus, they don&#039;t inherently possess human amiability that would motivate them to modify their behavior for the good of society. However that may change as we collectively come to expect more from companies and their faces (i.e. brands).

Look at the way fashion designer and professional foot sucker Kenneth Cole had to check himself after trying to &lt;a href=&quot;http://techcrunch.com/2011/02/03/kenneth-cold/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;capitalise on the Egyptian protests&lt;/a&gt;. The world shouted &quot;that&#039;s not cool man&quot; loudly to a brand, even before it was revealed an actual person made the faux pas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, people will never regard brands in the same way as actual people in the social media space, but they are beginning to expect the same behavior of brands as they are of people.</p>
<p>There is a great moment in the great documentary <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0379225/" rel="nofollow">The Corporation</a>, where a forensic psychologist is asked to define a corporation as if it were a person. Its concluded that a corporation would be a sociopath, because they lack empathy and pursue their own ends without consideration for other people. Companies have never been subject to significant public opinion before social media&#8217;s prevalence, only to shareholder, investor or customer opinion. That is their only impetus, they don&#8217;t inherently possess human amiability that would motivate them to modify their behavior for the good of society. However that may change as we collectively come to expect more from companies and their faces (i.e. brands).</p>
<p>Look at the way fashion designer and professional foot sucker Kenneth Cole had to check himself after trying to <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2011/02/03/kenneth-cold/" rel="nofollow">capitalise on the Egyptian protests</a>. The world shouted &#8220;that&#8217;s not cool man&#8221; loudly to a brand, even before it was revealed an actual person made the faux pas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on vulnerABILITY by James</title>
		<link>http://onproductions.com.au/2011/02/03/vulnerability/comment-page-1/#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 04:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onproductions.com.au/?p=963#comment-201</guid>
		<description>The dynamics &quot;between people and a brand&quot; might get more lifelike online, but I don&#039;t think anyone will ever confuse a brand with a real person and treat them as such.

That said, I think I need to stop stating the obvious! How&#039;s that for candid?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The dynamics &#8220;between people and a brand&#8221; might get more lifelike online, but I don&#8217;t think anyone will ever confuse a brand with a real person and treat them as such.</p>
<p>That said, I think I need to stop stating the obvious! How&#8217;s that for candid?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

